ANONYMOUS wrote:
> Is it correct that the syntax assumptions in the report do not have to align with the advice given on this help forum?
I mean a lot of the advice given on the forum is based off the project requirements and clarifications Chris made, so it really depends on which advice you are talking about.
A rule of thumb for assumptions is: If you make an assumption that goes against the project specification or what Chris or Amitava said to do you will lose marks. Otherwise for ambiguities where no clarification was given or I made it clear it is up to Amitava then you can list that in the assumptions.
> Such as if global variables, variable reassignment and parameter checking have already been implemented, they can be listed as assumptions and we shouldn't lose marks for adding those checks.
>
> Thanks
You definitely won't lose marks for doing more work if that's what you are asking? It demonstrates your ability to write robust C code, which is good.