It's UWAweek 38 (2nd semester, week 8)

help2002

This forum is provided to promote discussion amongst students enrolled in CITS2002 Systems Programming.
Please consider offering answers and suggestions to help other students! And if you fix a problem by following a suggestion here, it would be great if other interested students could see a short "Great, fixed it!"  followup message.
Displaying selected article
Showing 1 of 487 articles.
Currently 16 other people reading this forum.


 UWA week 31 (2nd semester, week 2) ↓
SVG not supported

Login to reply

👍x1
helpful

In this morning's lecture, I mentioned that recent work on the sustainability of computing had recently measured the power consumption of contemporary programming languages on a series of benchmarks. The paper is titled: Ranking programming languages by energy efficiency https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167642321000022?via%3Dihub The full paper is behind a paywall, but you should be able to access using campus networks. Abstract: "This paper compares a large set of programming languages regarding their efficiency, including from an energetic point-of-view. Indeed, we seek to establish and analyze different rankings for programming languages based on their energy efficiency. The goal of being able to rank programming languages based on their energy efficiency is both recent, and certainly deserves further studies. We have taken rigorous and strict solutions to 10 well defined programming problems, expressed in (up to) 27 programming languages, from the well known Computer Language Benchmark Game repository. This repository aims to compare programming languages based on a strict set of implementation rules and configurations for each benchmarking problem. We have also built a framework to automatically, and systematically, run, measure and compare the energy, time, and memory efficiency of such solutions. Ultimately, it is based on such comparisons that we propose a series of efficiency rankings, based on single and multiple criteria. Our results show interesting findings, such as how slower/faster languages can consume less/more energy, and how memory usage influences energy consumption. We also present a simple way to use our results to provide software engineers and practitioners support in deciding which language to use when energy efficiency is a concern."



This article has 1 attachment:

 

The University of Western Australia

Computer Science and Software Engineering

CRICOS Code: 00126G
Written by [email protected]
Powered by history
Feedback always welcome - it makes our software better!
Last modified  8:08AM Aug 25 2024
Privacy policy