ANONYMOUS wrote You are correct on that, yes. By not incrementing the time that is the expected output - you should list that as one of your assumptions though, just in case.

ANONYMOUS wrote This is what the inputs and outputs would look like for anyone loading pages again in.txt 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 3 2 1 2 out.txt 99, 1, 2, 3 5, 99, 6, 7 99, 99, 0, 99 99, 4, 99, 99 2,2,17; 2,2,17; 0,1,7; 0,1,7; 0,2,8; 0,2,8; 0,3...

I got the same output, so it's probably correct. In case anyone is looking at this later and wants to know the output for not allowing process pages to be read more than once, the output should be something like this 0, 1, 2, 3 4, 7, 99, 99 99, 9...

ANONYMOUS wrote It does seem like this question is an issue with semantics ( which has happened before (https secure.csse.uwa.edu.au run help2002?p np opt U463 year 2019)) and being such a minute detail of the system call. It seems, at least, possi...

After going through multiple years of forums, I believe I found an answer to this specific question here https secure.csse.uwa.edu.au run help2002?p np opt U215 year 2019 You also note that the question has similar phrasing to questions 8, 10, and 1...