Please consider offering answers and suggestions to help other students!
And if you fix a problem by following a suggestion here,
it would be great if other interested students could see a short
"Great, fixed it!" followup message.
How do I ask a good question?
Displaying 7 tagged articles
Showing 7 of 260 articles.
Currently 3 other people reading this forum.
ANONYMOUS wrote
In practice the situation is blurred because the PL and DLL are combined in a Media Access Control (MAC) Layer, such as a single Ethernet interface card. If taken too literally - that the PL is just the wire itself, the scene where e...
ANONYMOUS wrote
Discarding DATA will result in it, eventually, being re-transmitted, but not for the longest (anticipated) time. During the period of time, we hope that the congestion will 'die' down while the sender waits for the ACK (which will now...
Lecture 2 states " RX Monitors (only detects) transmission errors" as a responsibility of the physical layer.
How does the physical layer detect errors? Are detection techniques such as hamming, parity, crc etc not a function of the DLL?
Could I als...
When choosing the best candidates for removal via load shedding, why is it that we discard DATA instead of ACKs, as per the lecture notes?
Wouldn't it be easier to retransmit just a single bit for an ACK or is it to do with the idea that the ACK is ne...
ANONYMOUS wrote
Hello, yes, you are correct.
I have corrected the last sentence on each of page 20 and page 21.
(There seems to have been some poor cut-and-paste going on there - I wonder for how many years it went un-noticed...?)
Thanks.
I think the statement is pointing out that even though an application (a node) is generating bursty traffic. Because this traffic is being fed into the leaky bucket algorithm, it doesn't saturate the network as the leaky bucket only permits a specifi...
Hi, i am hoping to get some clarification on this statement from pg. 20 of Wk. 5 lecture
"The leaky bucket algorithm enables an application to generate bursty traffic (high volume, for a short period) without saturating the network".
I would've though...