It's UWAweek 47

help3200

This forum is provided to promote discussion amongst students enrolled in CITS3200 Professional Computing.

Please consider offering answers and suggestions to help other students! And if you fix a problem by following a suggestion here, it would be great if other interested students could see a short "Great, fixed it!"  followup message.

How do I ask a good question?
Displaying the 2 articles in this topic
Showing 2 of 129 articles.
Currently 22 other people reading this forum.


 UWA week 38 (2nd semester, week 8) ↓
SVG not supported

Login to reply

👍?
helpful
2:44pm Thu 19th Sep, ANONYMOUS

Hello, My team and I have encountered an issue with our timesheet where we did not report hours for certain categories appropriately. For example, we have a task in General Tasks listed as "Project Meeting and Communication". Instead of reporting hours spent on this task as a total of hours per person, it was reported as how many hours a meeting took(so if a meeting took 1 hour, instead of 6 hours, 1 hour was listed). There are also other discrepancies between per-person hours and booked hours. We are aware of how we've been previously instructed to not revise timesheet history. But would this count as error fixing, or would we simply roll all the hours we misreported over into the next weekly deliverable with a note for our auditor? We are unsure about rolling hours over in this particular case as it would result in quite a large sum of rolled-over hours, thus we decided to consult the forum. Thank you.


 UWA week 39 (2nd semester, week 9) ↓
SVG not supported

Login to reply

👍?
helpful
9:24am Thu 26th Sep, Michael W.

Hi, As I mentioned in another thread, please keep in mind that the timesheet is mainly an exercise in prediction, and a management tool for the project where it provides a consolidated view of progress to date (versus expectation). What I'm seeking to avoid is revisionism, where the past is altered in the light of experience, making learning impossible. OTOH, if what was listed was wrong, then correction is appropriate. The issue is: what was the reality then, and what is it now. Makes sense? Cheers MichaelW 👨‍🎨

The University of Western Australia

Computer Science and Software Engineering

CRICOS Code: 00126G
Written by [email protected]
Powered by history
Feedback always welcome - it makes our software better!
Last modified  8:08AM Aug 25 2024
Privacy policy