"David May" <17*1*2*[email protected]*u*e*t*u*a*e*u*a*> wrote:
> The specifications state only "the other visualisations should present some more> insightful information, such as any URLs that are 'trending' across the week, or> more meaningful descriptions of the locations from which requests are made."
You're given some freedom to choose what and how you want to display; in previous years (when a similar task asked
for more examples0, students appreciated that the task was no so prescriptive.
> I have performed searches on Google for "trending URL" but only found references to> trending tags, trending searches and similar things. In any case, as I understand > from what I read, the notion of trending X (whatever X is) relates to anomaly > detection; and every Internet platform seems do it that differently and their > algorithms are proprietary.
All are just examples of something that is increasing; in our case, we have data across just one week. Was the use
of any particular URLs significantly increasing over the week? URLs often embed search terms, and these are often
reported as trending (becoming increasingly popular over a short time).
(here's an amazing example of an online Calculus exam in the US, in which students were permitted to use Google
searches during the exam:
But that was just a suggestion.
> I also do not understand what is meant by "more meaningful descriptions of the> locations from which requests are made". This seems even more unclear than the> trending URLs suggestion: I did not even know how to formulate a search query> for it.
Each request in the weblog has a recorded IP adresss (the first field). Most are from the same IP address (a proxy
server), but others are could give away the physical location from where the request was made (there are some free
web-services to roughly map IP addresses to location).
But, again, just a suggestion.