ANONYMOUS wrote:> Although I'm not sure how this could be a surprise considering the fact that the project was > itself was released late, with the getting started page being released roughly 12 days late.
Released Friday 24th April, in the week that it was always due to come out:
with the first student seeking clarification on Sun 26th April, over the long weekend:
When first released, Getting Started was a section on the single project page, but later that day a new
Getting Started page was written; certainly there by Wed 29th:
Very unsure where you get your 12 days from. ?
Then, some appear to have started the project later than others:
https://discord.com/channels/586127025228742656/586576957811195904/714332683379015753> The "roughly 5 points" per week is actually around three times more.> I've listed the seemingly more important topics covered for reference.
What you have simply provided is a list of the titles of each lecture slide.
It's bordering on childish.
Every unit's lectures have many slides; the slide titles are not the distinct
topics to be studied, they simply identify the material on the slide.
I'll reiterate that each of our assessable lectures have about 5 topics to study,
as identified on our Schedule page.