Just making sure, is regex.h permitted? We have used some regex for string parsing. As far as I know, it is considered a system-provided (POSIX) library.
CITS2002 Project 1 2024
Student1 STUDENT-NUMBER1 NAME-1
Student2 STUDENT-NUMBER2 NAME-2
Platform Linux (or Apple)
Hi, if I have been using windows but have been writing my code in VSC with WSL, should I indicate windows or L...
I used a random number 24096 to test question 5 from the mid-semester test, and for both options a and d the output was 9 (which is the correct output in both cases). Can anyone tell me why option d is wrong or is their two solutions?
ANONYMOUS wrote
I mean a lot of the advice given on the forum is based off the project requirements and clarifications Chris made, so it really depends on which advice you are talking about.
A rule of thumb for assumptions is If you make an assumpti...
Is it correct that the syntax assumptions in the report do not have to align with the advice given on this help forum?
Such as if global variables, variable reassignment and parameter checking have already been implemented, they can be listed as assum...
I have a question regarding the project, specifically point 8 within the assignment brief
The variables arg0, arg1, and so on, provide access to the program's command-line arguments which provide real-valued number...
Hello, I just wanted to check if I'm on the right track
The runml.c program
1) reads the .ml text file
2) translates the .ml text into valid C syntax
3) writes the translated C syntax into an output.c file
4) then complies and runs the output.c file
this ...
ANONYMOUS wrote
This is a statement, so yes. pqr will be zero so it won't matter. sas will cause the error, since there are two identifiers followed after each other in a statement, which is invalid syntax.
I recall that on my question on this thread (https secure.csse.uwa.edu.au run help2002?p np opt U308) it was proposed that we compile code without -Werror, but even if we just use -Wall it also throws all warnings, is that expected and fine? Here i...
I am OP,
I just wanted to comment i've read the post you linked and it appears Chris said the opposite for anybody else who see's this. I have hence implemented the ability to check user inputs.
ANONYMOUS wrote
It does seem like this question is an issue with semantics ( which has happened before (https secure.csse.uwa.edu.au run help2002?p np opt U463 year 2019)) and being such a minute detail of the system call. It seems, at least, possi...
ANONYMOUS wrote
Thanks for the link. However, unless I'm misinterpreting it, that thread ended unresolved too. Dr. McDonald's only contribution in that thread was a non-answer (below)
All the other messages seem to be speculation, where the same argu...