It's UWAweek 47

help5501

This forum is provided to promote discussion amongst students enrolled in CITS5501 Software Testing and Quality Assurance. If posting a question, it's suggested you check first whether your question is answered in the unit Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) list, and use the search box (on the right) to see if an answer to your question has already been posted.

Please consider offering answers and suggestions to help other students! And if you fix a problem by following a suggestion here, it would be great if other interested students could see a short "Great, fixed it!"  followup message.

Note that any posts must comply with the UWA Code of Conduct and the UWA Academic Conduct Policy. That means you should (a) treat everyone with respect and courtesy, and (b) not post your solutions to an assessment that's in progress.

If asking a programming question, it's recommended you read How do I ask a good question? If reporting or troubleshooting a bug in software used in the unit, it's recommend you read How to report bugs effectively.
Displaying selected article
Showing 1 of 135 articles.
Currently 13 other people reading this forum.


 UWA week 34 (2nd semester, week 5) ↓
SVG not supported

Login to reply

👍?
helpful
12:12pm Wed 21st Aug, ANONYMOUS

Hi Arran, I wanted to share some feedback regarding the quiz. I noticed that some questions have very misleading instructions. For instance, many questions state, "select one or more" or "select all true," but in reality, there is only one correct answer to these questions. On the other hand, there are questions with no indication of how many answers to select, yet the correct answers are multiple. Due to these misleading instructions, I selected additional options I wasn’t sure about for questions with instructions to select one or more. However, this resulted in a 0 mark even when I had selected the correct option. I hope that future exams won’t have such misleading prompts. Suppose the misleading instructions are intended to increase the quiz's difficulty. In that case, the marking criteria should reflect this by awarding points for the partially correct selections without wrong selections. I believe this would be a fairer way to allocate points for questions where it’s unclear how many correct answers there are. At the very least, it would prevent me from having to select uncertain options. Thank you for considering my suggestion.

The University of Western Australia

Computer Science and Software Engineering

CRICOS Code: 00126G
Written by [email protected]
Powered by history
Feedback always welcome - it makes our software better!
Last modified  8:08AM Aug 25 2024
Privacy policy