It's UWAweek 20 (1st semester, week 11)

help3002

This forum is provided to promote discussion amongst students enrolled in CITS3002 Computer Networks.

Please consider offering answers and suggestions to help other students! And if you fix a problem by following a suggestion here, it would be great if other interested students could see a short "Great, fixed it!"  followup message. How do I ask a good question?

Chris is away until 4th June. Dr Atif Mansoor is the unit's coordinator until then.
Displaying the 4 articles in this topic
Showing 4 of 446 articles.
Currently no other people reading this forum.


 UWA week 19 (1st semester, week 10) ↓
SVG not supported

Login to reply

👍?
helpful
3:06pm Tue 7th May, ANONYMOUS

What data are we actually allowed to send from station to station? If we start at StationA, can StationA send its UDP hostname and port to the neighboring stations so that overtime a list of visited stations can be built up? Or are we only allowed to send station names with no networking info along what so ever.


SVG not supported

Login to reply

👍?
helpful
4:20am Wed 8th May, Christopher M.

ANONYMOUS wrote:
> What data are we actually allowed to send from station to station? > > If we start at StationA, can StationA send its UDP hostname and port to the neighboring stations so that overtime a list of visited stations can be built up? Or are we only allowed to send station names with no networking info along what so ever.
Stations can only communicate with their neighbours, using UDP and their port number provided on the command-line. A station is not permitted to know the hostname/port of any non-neighbouring station, so that information should not be sent over the network. You can send station names in your 'outgoing' queries, and station names will be returned in replies to those queries. I hope that's clear?


SVG not supported

Login to reply

👍?
helpful
11:14am Wed 8th May, ANONYMOUS

But what's the issue in simply sending only the original station's network information into the datagram that's been sent out? If once a response is found, that station can simply just use that information and directly send the response back to the original station by sending just a single UDP response without the need to backtrack through all the stations its visited which would essentially increase the chance of it being lost as well the time the original station to get the response. I don't really understand why it shouldn't be allowed.


SVG not supported

Login to reply

👍?
helpful
11:33am Wed 8th May, Christopher M.

ANONYMOUS wrote:
> But what's the issue in simply sending only the original station's network information into the datagram that's been sent out?
Because the station that determines the best result, possibly by receiving and comparing multiple responses, might not be a neighbour of the original station that started the query.
> I don't really understand why it shouldn't be allowed.
There are many possible ways to implement this application; our project specifies that only neighbours may communicate with each other.

The University of Western Australia

Computer Science and Software Engineering

CRICOS Code: 00126G
Written by [email protected]
Powered by history
Feedback always welcome - it makes our software better!
Last modified  5:07AM Sep 06 2023
Privacy policy